Flooding in Kotikawatta in Sri Lanka “Is it a curse?

The issue of Kelani Ganga overflowing at Kotikawatta and submerging the lowlands is a multifaceted problem, influenced by various socio-political and environmental factors. Here are some reasons why it appears that no government has taken decisive action to address this issue:

  1. Complexity and Cost of Solutions:
  • Effective flood control measures, such as constructing dams, levees, or advanced drainage systems, are extremely costly and require significant engineering expertise. Governments might find it challenging to allocate the necessary budget and resources, especially if other areas demand more immediate attention.
  1. Bureaucratic and Administrative Challenges:
  • Implementing large-scale infrastructure projects involves navigating through layers of bureaucracy, obtaining necessary approvals, and coordinating among multiple governmental and non-governmental agencies. This can slow down the process considerably.
  1. Environmental Concerns:
  • Flood management interventions can have significant environmental impacts, such as altering ecosystems, displacing wildlife, and affecting downstream water flows. Balancing flood control with environmental sustainability requires careful planning and often faces opposition from environmental groups.
  1. Political Considerations:
  • Flood control projects may not be seen as politically advantageous. Politicians often prioritize projects that provide immediate and visible benefits to their constituents. The benefits of flood control, while significant, are long-term and may not yield immediate political rewards.
  1. Land and Property Issues:
  • The land needed for flood control infrastructure may be privately owned, requiring the government to engage in negotiations or expropriations, which can be contentious and legally complex.
  1. Urban Development and Encroachment:
  • Unplanned urbanization and illegal construction on floodplains exacerbate the flooding problem. Governments might struggle with enforcing regulations and relocating communities, which can lead to social unrest and opposition.
  1. Historical and Cultural Factors:
  • There might be historical reasons for the current state of flood management, including past governance decisions, traditional land use practices, and community resilience strategies that have evolved over time.
  1. Lack of Public Pressure:
  • If the affected communities lack political influence or if there is insufficient public outcry, the issue might not receive the attention it deserves. Governments tend to prioritize issues that are more pressing or politically sensitive.
  1. Climate Change:
  • Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, making it more difficult to predict and manage flooding. Adapting to these changes requires forward-thinking policies and international cooperation, which can be challenging to implement.

In summary, the recurring flooding of Kelani Ganga at Kotikawatta involves a combination of financial, administrative, environmental, political, and social challenges. Addressing it requires a coordinated, multi-faceted approach that balances immediate needs with long-term planning and sustainability.

💥 The only thing to do is to raise the embankment where the river overflows.

Raising the embankment where the Kelani Ganga overflows at Kotikawatta could indeed be a direct and effective method to mitigate flooding. However, there are several considerations and potential challenges involved in this approach. Here’s an analysis of why even this seemingly simple solution might not be straightforward for the government to implement:

Technical and Engineering Challenges

  1. Assessment and Design:
  • Before raising the embankment, a thorough hydrological and geotechnical assessment is necessary to ensure the embankment’s design can withstand future flood events. This requires expertise and time for accurate planning and design.
  1. Construction Difficulties:
  • The construction process itself may face difficulties due to the terrain, weather conditions, and the need to work around existing infrastructure and settlements. Ensuring the embankment is built to the correct specifications and standards is crucial.

Financial Constraints

  1. Funding Allocation:
  • Raising the embankment requires significant financial investment. Governments might face challenges in prioritizing this expenditure over other pressing needs, especially if the budget is limited.
  1. Maintenance Costs:
  • Even after construction, the embankment will require ongoing maintenance to ensure its integrity. This adds to the long-term financial burden.

Social and Environmental Considerations

  1. Impact on Local Communities:
  • The construction work might disrupt local communities, including displacement of residents and businesses. Managing these impacts requires careful planning and compensation, which can be politically and socially sensitive.
  1. Environmental Impact:
  • Modifying the embankment could have downstream effects on the river’s ecosystem, affecting water flow, sediment transport, and local wildlife habitats. Environmental impact assessments are necessary to mitigate these effects.

Bureaucratic and Administrative Hurdles

  1. Regulatory Approvals:
  • Multiple regulatory approvals might be required from various government agencies, which can delay the project. Coordinating between these bodies can be complex.
  1. Land Acquisition:
  • The government may need to acquire private land to raise the embankment, leading to potential legal and logistical challenges, including negotiations with landowners and possible legal disputes.

Political Factors

  1. Public Perception and Support:
  • Gaining public support is crucial. If the local population does not see the immediate benefit or is affected negatively during the construction phase, there could be public opposition.
  1. Political Will:
  • Implementing such projects requires strong political will and commitment. Governments may hesitate if they perceive that the political cost (such as potential backlash from displaced communities) outweighs the benefits.

Strategic Planning

  1. Integrated Flood Management:
  • Raising the embankment should be part of a broader, integrated flood management strategy that includes early warning systems, better urban planning, and emergency response measures.

Conclusion

While raising the embankment at Kotikawatta is a plausible and potentially effective solution to prevent flooding from Kelani Ganga, it involves a range of technical, financial, social, environmental, bureaucratic, and political challenges. Addressing these comprehensively requires careful planning, adequate funding, and coordinated efforts across various sectors and stakeholders.

🌟 The houses and belongings of the people of Kotikawatta area are destroyed every year due to floods.

The recurring destruction of houses and belongings of the people in the Kotikawatta area due to annual floods is a serious issue that demands attention. Here is a detailed explanation of why the situation persists and potential steps that could be taken to address it effectively:

Current Situation and Impact

  1. Annual Flooding:
  • The Kelani Ganga overflows during heavy rains, leading to floods that submerge low-lying areas, including Kotikawatta. This results in the destruction of homes, loss of personal belongings, and disruption of daily life.
  1. Human and Economic Cost:
  • Each flood event leads to significant human suffering, economic loss, and long-term impacts on the livelihoods of the affected communities. Rebuilding homes and replacing belongings is a financial strain for residents, many of whom may already be economically vulnerable.

Reasons for Inaction

  1. Resource Constraints:
  • Governments often operate under tight budgets, and allocating funds for large-scale infrastructure projects like raising embankments or improving drainage systems can be challenging. Prioritizing these projects over others is a complex decision influenced by available resources and competing needs.
  1. Bureaucratic Challenges:
  • Implementing flood control measures involves multiple layers of bureaucracy. Coordination among different governmental departments, securing necessary permits, and overcoming administrative delays can hinder timely action.
  1. Political Considerations:
  • Flood control projects might not be seen as immediate priorities compared to other pressing issues. Politicians may focus on short-term gains or more visible projects that yield immediate benefits to garner public support.
  1. Land and Property Issues:
  • Raising embankments or constructing flood defenses may require acquiring private land, leading to legal disputes and resistance from property owners. Ensuring fair compensation and managing relocations is a complex process.
  1. Environmental and Technical Challenges:
  • Engineering projects to control flooding must balance effectiveness with environmental sustainability. Changes to the river’s flow can impact ecosystems and downstream communities, requiring detailed environmental impact assessments.

Potential Solutions

  1. Raising the Embankment:
  • As you suggested, raising the embankment is a direct method to prevent flooding. This involves constructing higher and stronger barriers along the river to contain floodwaters.
  1. Improving Drainage Systems:
  • Enhancing urban drainage systems to quickly channel excess water away from residential areas can mitigate flood impacts. This includes upgrading sewers and building retention basins.
  1. Implementing Early Warning Systems:
  • Developing and deploying early warning systems can help residents prepare for impending floods, reducing loss of life and property.
  1. Flood-Resilient Infrastructure:
  • Encouraging or mandating the construction of flood-resistant homes and infrastructure can reduce the damage caused by floods.
  1. Community Awareness and Preparedness:
  • Educating the local community about flood risks and emergency preparedness can help minimize impacts. This includes training on evacuation plans and safeguarding valuables.
  1. Integrated Flood Management Plans:
  • Developing comprehensive flood management plans that incorporate river basin management, urban planning, and emergency response strategies. This holistic approach ensures long-term sustainability and resilience.
  1. Funding and International Assistance:
  • Securing funding from national budgets, international aid, and development organizations can provide the necessary resources for implementing flood control measures.

Conclusion

The annual destruction caused by flooding in Kotikawatta highlights the urgent need for effective intervention. While raising the embankment is a viable solution, it must be part of a broader strategy that includes improving infrastructure, enhancing community preparedness, and securing adequate funding. Addressing bureaucratic, political, and technical challenges is essential for sustainable and long-term flood management. The government, in collaboration with local communities and international partners, can take decisive action to mitigate this recurring problem and protect the lives and livelihoods of the affected residents.

Labeling the flooding in Kotikawatta as a “curse” is more of a metaphorical way to describe the persistent and devastating nature of the problem rather than an explanation grounded in fact. The recurring flooding can be understood through a combination of natural, infrastructural, and socio-political factors. Here’s a detailed examination of why the flooding issue in Kotikawatta persists, often giving the impression of an unavoidable “curse”:

Natural Factors

  1. Geographical Location:
  • Kotikawatta is situated in a low-lying area near the Kelani Ganga, making it inherently susceptible to flooding, especially during the monsoon season.
  1. Climate Change:
  • Increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events due to climate change exacerbate flooding risks. Heavier rainfall overwhelms the river’s capacity, leading to overflow.

Infrastructural Issues

  1. Inadequate Flood Defenses:
  • The existing flood defenses, such as embankments and drainage systems, may be insufficient or poorly maintained. This allows the river to overflow and submerge the lowlands.
  1. Urbanization and Encroachment:
  • Rapid urbanization and encroachment on floodplains reduce the area available for water to naturally disperse, increasing flood risk. Poor urban planning and uncontrolled construction exacerbate the problem.
  1. Drainage Problems:
  • Inefficient or clogged drainage systems fail to channel excess rainwater away from residential areas, leading to flooding.

Socio-Political Factors

  1. Resource Allocation:
  • Limited financial resources and competing priorities often result in insufficient investment in flood control infrastructure. Other pressing issues may divert attention and funding.
  1. Bureaucratic Delays:
  • Implementation of flood management projects can be slowed down by bureaucratic hurdles, regulatory requirements, and inter-agency coordination challenges.
  1. Political Will:
  • The lack of sustained political commitment to addressing flood risks might be due to a focus on more immediate or politically advantageous projects. Flood management requires long-term planning and investment, which may not align with short-term political cycles.

Environmental Considerations

  1. Ecosystem Impact:
  • Changes to natural water flow and ecosystem dynamics due to human activities can increase flood vulnerability. For example, deforestation upstream can lead to higher water runoff and sedimentation in rivers.

Community Factors

  1. Public Awareness and Preparedness:
  • Lack of public awareness and preparedness exacerbates the impact of floods. Educating communities about flood risks and emergency response can mitigate damage and improve resilience.

Possible Solutions

  1. Infrastructure Improvements:
  • Investing in robust flood defenses, such as raising embankments, building retention basins, and upgrading drainage systems, can significantly reduce flood risks.
  1. Urban Planning and Regulation:
  • Implementing strict urban planning regulations to prevent construction on floodplains and ensuring proper land use can mitigate the risk of flooding.
  1. Climate Adaptation Strategies:
  • Developing and implementing climate adaptation strategies to address the impacts of climate change, such as creating green spaces to absorb rainwater and improving weather forecasting systems.
  1. Community Engagement:
  • Engaging local communities in flood management planning and preparedness activities ensures that they are better equipped to respond to and recover from flood events.
  1. Government and International Support:
  • Securing funding and technical assistance from national governments and international organizations can provide the necessary resources for comprehensive flood management.

Conclusion

While the term “curse” captures the frustration and despair of recurrent flooding in Kotikawatta, the issue is rooted in a complex interplay of natural vulnerabilities, infrastructural deficiencies, and socio-political challenges. Addressing these underlying causes through a combination of improved infrastructure, effective urban planning, climate adaptation, and community engagement can break the cycle of flooding and reduce its devastating impacts.

●☆Compilation and script by Dr S.Priyantha of Sri Lanka ☆●

Leave a comment